|Released by MGM
Directed by Clarence Brown
Run time: 76 minutes
Proof That It’s a Pre-Code Film
- Joan Crawford plays a fallen, kept woman who loves her life no matter how many times she gets trampled on or slapped.
- Plenty of people get called “cheap little tramp”, enough to go around.
Possessed: Never Let Me Go
“There are two kinds of people. The ones ‘in’ and the ones ‘out.”
“Doesn’t sound easy.”
“Anything is easy for a woman.”
Clarence Brown’s Possessed is a breath of fresh air, an idea I normally don’t associate with movies in the ‘fallen woman’ genre, which usually end in death, disappointment, or, if you’re lucky, a woman’s highly successful children prosecuting them for murder.
We start with Marian (Crawford), a small town girl working in a cardboard box factory, setup for a life so bland it almost verges into satire. She’s pretty much doomed to be stuck with Al (Wallace Ford), one of those guy who has substituted a chip on his shoulder for a personality. Watching the trains come in one day, she catches the eye of a sauced socialite named Wally Stewart (Skeets Gallagher), who offers her a few bon mots and champagne. The pouring of his champagne is contrasted by a bowl of Al’s melted ice cream; there’s a difference between ‘pop’ and ‘plop’.
Marian pulls up stakes and heads to New York to reunite with Stewart, who is annoyed that anyone would take anything he says at face value. Coated in a nice layer of snappy dialogue (“The East River is full of girls who took advice from a man like me.”) we watch as Stewart tries to pin down Marian’s sob story:
“Now don’t tell me you don’t have a dear old crippled grandma.”
“And you’re not putting your old man through college?”
“And you don’t have three orphan nieces starving for bread?!”
“And what are you here for?”
It’s a refreshing, liberated moment. But she’s honest; she wants money, and, in 1931, that means a man, and she’ll do anything to snag a rich one. That’s when Stewart’s straight-laced friend Mark (Gable) waltzes in and is instantly smitten with the woman who tells him immediately that she’s after him for his money.
We flash forward a few years and Mark and Marian are in close syncopation. The only catch? They haven’t gotten married. Mark won’t propose, worried that he’s setting himself up for a massive public-relations fiasco if the relationship then does go south. Yes, the most powerful man of the film is terrified of intimacy and embarrassment– and Marian is just content to be in love.
Things change sharply, suddenly, as Al reappears, richer now and assuming he can pick things back up with Marian since he has a little coin and Mark’s help. When the possibility of Mark running for governor comes up, Marian’s position is in even more peril. Does she give up the man she loves to force him to assume his destiny? Or does she hold onto her own desires?
Mark’s vulnerability is an interesting thing throughout the movie, as Gable plays him as a man with a romantic streak but who must be essentially a robot in all other regards to life. Success is achievement without notoriety, something he has a hard time grappling with. His breakdown at the film’s end, when he realizes that Marian deceived him about just using him, works extremely well. That’s because while he’s been built up on a man clearly geared towards greatness, we fully believe he loves Marian more than his tattered political career, and that he would have gone to her regardless. That’s a hell of a balancing act, and the movie pulls it off nicely.
One really enjoyable thing about the film is how it makes Al both an easy villain an interesting contrast with Marian’s own actions. When Marian gets money, she uses it to better herself and provides for her mother. When Al gets it, he just wants what he’s lost back, and is willing to spend as much of other people’s money as it takes to get it. When faced with someone they love losing their life’s passion, Marian takes it on the chin. Al denounces the person and throws a fit. Marian can see the big picture, Al just sees his own feet.
Marian is such an interesting, dynamic character through all of this, making her way in the world, and refusing to settle for multiple opportunities to take something easier or safer. She is wholly self-determined, nurturing but understanding, loving but with a distinct set of desires. Crawford is perfect at embodying this swinging between gumption and sophistication to make her way in a world that is clearly hostile to exactly what she is; a sophisticated, determined woman.
The chemistry between Crawford and Gable is also a high point to the film; there’s a fiery undertow to their conversations, something movies like the similarly stylish Forbidden with Stanwyck and Adolphe Menjou sadly lack. Brown helps the film immeasurably, relying on stylish shots to tell the story with MGM class; watch as the train rolls by early in the film, revealing the life of the rich to a gaping Crawford. Or one fantastic montage as more jewels appear on an arm that tears the years down from a calendar.
With visual and verbal with connecting to a well-told story, this may be Crawford’s best film of the pre-Code era. I mean, the ending is pretty much happy? How often does that even happen in one of these things?
Screen Capture Gallery
Click to enlarge and browse. Please feel free to reuse with credit!
Other Reviews, Trivia, and Links
- Not to be confused with the Joan Crawford vehicle Possessed from 1947, which has nothing to do with this one outside the title. The 1947 film also stars my third favorite Van, Van Heflin. For those curious about my rankings, he comes after Van Johnson and Dick Van Dyke, but ahead of Van Helsing (2004).
- Crawford and Gable had a heated love affair on the set of this one, though both were married at the time. They would work together many times, including pre-Codes Laughing Sinners, Dancing Lady, Chained, and Forsaking All Others.
- This movie was discussed in-depth in the third episode of the “Any Ladle’s Sweet” podcast, which talked about sexuality in pre-Code Hollywood. You can listen to it here.
- The incomparable MovieDiva goes into the histories of Crawford, Gable, and Brown, and the influence of its immoral behavior:
Possessed was the most “brazen” of the fallen women films, because of Crawford’s lack of punishment for her sins. She was so popular, especially among young women, that her influence was considered to be downright dangerous. “’You will be interested to hear the comment of two young girls sitting next to me when I previewed the picture’ huffed Mrs. Alonzo Richardson, a member of the Atlanta Board of Review. ‘One said to the other I would live with him, too, under any conditions.’” Another film critic ranted that “school girls and serving maids will pay Metro hundreds of thousands of dollars to watch this film and dream about it for days afterwards” another moral arbiter chided, “Norma Shearer and Joan Crawford introduce our little girls to the’ romance’ of kept women” (Viera Sin p. 55). But, did they fear the lure of illicit sex, or Crawford’s portrayal of feisty indpendence?
- Mike Grost goes into how the film plays into the career of Clarence Brown, calling this one of the best ‘Fallen Women’ pictures along with Bed of Roses and Blonde Venus. Here he talks about the film’s legacy:
Another depth shot in the film is even more startling. This is the train sequence towards the beginning, when Joan Crawford peers into the train moving by, and sees all the inhabitants of the cars. The photography in this shot is so virtuosic, that it was included in Visions of Light (1992), a fascinating compilation film about American Cinematography. Seeing this clip in fact caused me to hunt up a videotape of Possessed, a film I had in fact never heard of. Like most early 1930’s films, it is nearly completely forgotten today.
- Mordaunt Hall in the New York Times calls it, “a gratifying entertainment”.
- TCMDB talks about the Crawford/Gable affair quite a bit, as well as placing it firmly in Crawford’s early-30s filmography:
But their magnetic appeal as a screen couple first became apparent in Possessed with its potent blend of politics and sex. Not that the film was perfect – an unrealistic happy ending and Crawford’s rendition of “How Long Can It Last” delivered in three languages were low points – but Possessed also “proved to be an important film in the progress of Joan’s professional life. It ended forever her period in movies as an empty-headed hedonist with a passion for dance. Now she moved to portrayals of girls on the rise from the lower classes, an apt metaphor with Americans submerged in the Depression.” (from the biography Joan Crawford by Bob Thomas).
Awards, Accolades & Availability
- This film is available on Amazon via Warner Archive. Thanks to Warner Archive for providing a review copy of this film.